From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 4 15:46:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C99106566B; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D678FC25; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 15:46:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m24FhiAJ071514; Tue, 4 Mar 2008 08:43:44 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 08:44:12 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20080304.084412.139569940.imp@bsdimp.com> To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20080304153651.I41184@fledge.watson.org> References: <20080304151326.J41184@fledge.watson.org> <20080304.083350.1661915009.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080304153651.I41184@fledge.watson.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Comments on pmake diffs for building on Linux X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:46:33 -0000 In message: <20080304153651.I41184@fledge.watson.org> Robert Watson writes: : On Tue, 4 Mar 2008, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : > : In most ports of FreeBSD parts to Linux that I've seen, the preferred solution : > : has to been to bring the entire FreeBSD queue.h with you rather than relying : > : on the native Linux queue.h. This is what we do for OpenBSM, for example; : > : this also helps out when you get to Mac OS X, Solaris, etc, where all the : > : queue.h's continue to vary in subtle ways. This depends a fair amount on a : > : lack of header pollution in the OS's own include files, of course... : > : > I was rather hoping for something that could be used without any of that : > nonsense... : : Sadly, nonsense seems to be the name of the game in software portability. : Here's the broken autoconf garbage I use to pick out adequate queue.h's from : inadequate ones: : : # sys/queue.h exists on most systems, but its capabilities vary a great deal. : # test for LIST_FIRST and TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE, which appears to not exist in : # all of them, and are necessary for OpenBSM. : AC_TRY_LINK([ : #include : ], [ : : #ifndef LIST_FIRST : #error LIST_FIRST missing : #endif : #ifndef TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE : #error TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE : #endif : ], [ : AC_DEFINE(HAVE_FULL_QUEUE_H,, Define if queue.h includes LIST_FIRST) : ]) : : Note that there are at least a couple of mostly stylistic bugs there (could : use compile rather than link, definition description is poor, errors are : inconsistent). :-) I found that on both Linux and Mac OS X, the queue.h's : didn't have everything I wanted. Right. But I'm not going to use autoconf. It is totally off the table as far as I'm concerned. Warner