From nobody Fri Oct 6 22:50:21 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4S2NtP6SR1z4wrrZ for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S2NtP5SJKz4NXY for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1696632621; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=e0Ez+Tc9UUNwi8+8rOjXhpRt6qI/6h8hTYkqy7JQJOKwT7w9bmhcdEa7o2VlSXv9TuiHL4 g/Wis4eJq8yBSrI+HfgSlyvHOcbL+U6ET5TOEYXPVCeccVyjPuMQS5Mjn+6JkiRRDGNKnf ejTYp1UQAU/j5XB0hZ80CVTsVSqEZppRlur9U9x8F7z8u5QWEjtwT9o7WcXtK+SIKyt9B9 ZPyjKE3V1srh7vPiHWxJsRLYZf4H3d3MCFiMX7l+z/Q22zuRrCnlNnjPNjGywVKfLeJ7j9 gxFof/2tNyusX8QCE54NOiurmLPCDUws0L/kSdcuglo+h0WFmQCutoUTqdGdJA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1696632621; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=SoDLmBFx9/M4W6ykH/kKbSXZ4qVrl8a+tXj1yIe5chY=; b=WGJ+XoKeE36wzBaMd+7g3NkrsuQpsSlM41tQIlP+5jfHFTTDcIbqOoYE+r/nJwMFSMXPwk q+uAa0RIugzPs0io1DfkLyMyVEIRyGXfTLi4DTAI+nTuasWmZe89mlVOIDoTJmMEobeRjm BHB/f+XvQ6mP40otn+HMRBBjxnHtU7HYCxp+iQgITHTO3pfkRaxIX1pc7MQec5En2MsxGl kK4/3WmaFw114gHFGkh1KIKScEhjGjEG727aOtK7klu2bqrj4/KOebdvmjTxTAupdcO0mt nnS9K9WsTb5YB6cfiATzz8agSmsx+ybKz/R5wOoDrVwVd3x6J+an5l5V0AGFTg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4S2NtP4Wbcz1603 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 396MoLPp021524 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:50:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 396MoLgL021521 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 6 Oct 2023 22:50:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 274316] excessive memory consumed by static_single_cpu_mask Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2023 22:50:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D274316 Bjoern A. Zeeb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open --- Comment #1 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- people lately switched code, not here yet I assume; should I? Is mp_ncpus still the correct value to do run-time scaling? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=