From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 12 16:36:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B2FFC37B43E; Sat, 12 May 2001 16:36:19 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dwcjr@inethouston.net)
Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147])
	by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 829C510F40F; Sat, 12 May 2001 18:36:28 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <01b601c0db3c$5b02ba40$931576d8@inethouston.net>
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "John Polstra" <jdp@polstra.com>, "Ade Lovett" <ade@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: <cvs@FreeBSD.org>, <ports@FreeBSD.org>, <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
References: <XFMail.010512163006.jdp@polstra.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba-2.2.0_1
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 18:36:23 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

So how do we have both ports exist without confusing people by keeping samba
2.2.0 as samba devel, because I've gotten a few emails about people
wondering about its stability.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message