Date: Wed, 19 May 1999 20:32:26 +1000 From: David Hobley <davidh@wr.com.au> To: Piet Delaney <piet@cup.hp.com>, davidh@progmatics.com.au, hasty@netcom.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, obrien@nuxi.com, piet@hpfsvr02.cup.hp.com, piet@piet.net, sane-devel@mostang.com Subject: Re: Sane 1.0.1 - Looks like /usr/local/lib/libsaine-net.so.1 wasn't installed. Message-ID: <19990519203226.A17799@wr.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199905190953.CAA11098@hpfsvr02.cup.hp.com>; from Piet Delaney on Wed, May 19, 1999 at 02:53:18AM -0700 References: <199905190953.CAA11098@hpfsvr02.cup.hp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, May 19, 1999 at 02:53:18AM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote: > > > > Well, I have checked my config here. My dmesg reports: > > > > pt0 at ncr0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 > > pt0: <HP C5100A R032> Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device > > pt0: 3.300MB/s transfers > > Perhaps your using on an old kernel. Mine comes up with pass0 and pass1 > so it's using the new (brooken?) CAM interface. Well, I am using a 4.0-current kernel immediately prior to the newbus merge. However the actual config dates back to a 3.0-current around last October or so. I guess I may be using an outdated driver. My other SCSI devices (disks) are definitely using CAM though, so I don't know. The date in the file is: # $Id: GENERIC,v 1.130 1998/11/03 22:01:21 des Exp $ > > My kernel is configured to have: > > > > device pt0 at scbus? # SCSI processor type > > device sctarg0 at scbus? # SCSI target > > Interesting. My GENERIC kernel config doesn't have this. > I'm using version 1.169 of GENERIC. What version are you using? > > Does your have a line: > > device pass0 Yes it does, but nothing appears to use it. > > For some reason, when I run scanimage --list-devices, > > In my case I think scanimage is looking for the wrong type of > objects in /usr/local/lib/sane. I have all .a and .dl files. > What are .dl files (dynamic link I assume). Seems sane is > looking for .so.1 files (shared objects). Yep - my /usr/local/lib/sane has .so and .so.1 files in it (built from the port). > > > > xscanimage hp:/dev/pt0 > > I don't recall the docs suggesting this : format? Where was that? > That style is usually used by X. So scanimage and xscanimage have > a different syntax for the device even though it's the same executable. > Boy talking about under-documented features. I think some OS specific > examples would be helpfull. Yeah - this one was buried deep somewhere. It specifies the driver followed by the device. > Sure does, but I'm still stuck. Not surprise Dave O'Brien gave up > on this turkey. It's not very close to the Microsoft plug and play > paradigm. > > I'll read the SANE 1.01 manual when I get home; might help. > Seems like the Indian Blind man story where every observer > has a different view of reality. I suppose that's being in-sane. > <grin> -- Cheers, david -- http://www.angelfire.com/wa/hobley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990519203226.A17799>