Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:46:59 +0900 From: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> To: parv <parv_@yahoo.com>, f-ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: why "links" w/ "docproj"? Message-ID: <7mpua0gal8.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20010812145217.A1630@helios.soupnazi.org> References: <20010812010919.A46590@moo.holy.cow> <7m1ymhhbo2.wl@waterblue.imgsrc.co.jp> <20010812155140.A14709@moo.holy.cow> <20010812145217.A1630@helios.soupnazi.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sun, 12 Aug 2001 21:52:27 +0000 (UTC), Jim Mock wrote: > w3m has more dependencies than links does. The docproj port is large > enough to intimidate people already, and adding even more dependencies > to that would be a bad idea. Remember, just because *you* have > something, doesn't mean that everyone else does (and yes, I prefer w3m > to links myself). And w3m (actually devel/boehm-gc) cannot be built on Alpha platform (at least when we switch w3m to links). -- Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp> // IMG SRC, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7mpua0gal8.wl>