From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 25 21:49:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E498616A412 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp1.utdallas.edu (smtp1.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2D343D7B for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) by smtp1.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DE0388FFD for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:49:36 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:46:45 -0500 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <9B2E3C63B92F9B2FFD9A5004@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <453FBC81.7000903@computer.org> References: <25EF2257D42835E7C800F7AB@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <453FB3D3.4030308@computer.org> <12CC13AA49D069C7FAD7B7B2@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <453FBC81.7000903@computer.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.6 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; boundary="==========6E8FA5D62B168CD6052E==========" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: tcpwrappers & SSH X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:49:54 -0000 --==========6E8FA5D62B168CD6052E========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline --On Wednesday, October 25, 2006 14:35:29 -0500 Eric Schuele=20 wrote: > > I'm confused. I was agreeing with you. I was simply adding another > reason as to why the author of the "Wrapping sshd(8) is not normally a > good idea" comment might have made the comment. > > Are you saying that my comment above is incorrect? I guess I didn't word that well. I was trying to say that your=20 contribution was quite valuable. I should have remembered to point out=20 that you can easily lock yourself out of a server by forgetting to grant=20 access properly. IOW, thank you for pointing that out. :-) Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ --==========6E8FA5D62B168CD6052E==========--