From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  1 17:22:06 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id RAA17128
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 17:22:06 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id RAA17119
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 1 Aug 1995 17:22:05 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA05981; Tue, 1 Aug 95 18:14:25 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9508020014.AA05981@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: ISDN
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 95 18:14:24 MDT
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199508020010.KAA09872@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Aug 2, 95 10:10:18 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: current-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> >> Matthias Ulrich has _explicitly_ _complained_ that nobody did port his
> >> STREAMS package to BSD so far.  He made it clear that he is willing to
> 
> >This would probably be trivial for me; I've been deep in both the
> >Linux and BSD kernels for quite some time now.
> 
> >If it's non-trivial, well, then I'll say so.
> 
> It's politically non-trivial.

Because of licensing?

Or because of STREAMS being a bad word in many people's vocabulary?

If the former, Joerg's post [supposedly] says that the licensing's
not an issue.

If the latter, well, those people don't have to load the kernel
module.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.