Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:01:13 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCM options (was Re: Where is FreeBSD going?) Message-ID: <p06020456bc2623e3e15c@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <4000701B.40102@cream.org> References: <20040110032731.18864.qmail@web13422.mail.yahoo.com> <p06020453bc2558823646@[128.113.24.47]> <40003F4C.2000107@gamersimpact.com> <200401102020.17108.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <4000701B.40102@cream.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:35 PM +0000 1/10/04, Andrew Boothman wrote: >Peter Schuller wrote: > >>Most of the noteworthy features of subversion are listed >>on the project front page: >> >> http://subversion.tigris.org/ > >A significant one of which is the fact that it's available >under a BSD-style license. Meaning that the project wouldn't >have to rely on more GPLed code. > >I wonder if our SCM would be brought into the base system or >whether it would just be left in ports? We haven't even started to *test* subversion yet, so I think it's a bit early to worry about this question! -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06020456bc2623e3e15c>