From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 4 09:29:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D9B106566C for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:29:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C68F98FC16 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:29:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239]) by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 0C5C02798B8; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:13:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6291F17052; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:32:04 +0200 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan To: Giulio Ferro Message-ID: <20090604093204.GA94385@zeninc.net> References: <4A205679.5030406@zirakzigil.org> <20090531134541.H3234@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4A278950.8010802@zirakzigil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4A278950.8010802@zirakzigil.org> User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less. Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , Scott Ullrich , freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAT-T on current 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 09:29:09 -0000 On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 10:44:00AM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: [....] > Sorry for late feedback, very little time on my hands... Hi. > I've tried to interoperate with an old version of ipsec-tools (0.6.7) > and it takes a long time to start working, but it does in the end. > I didn't have much time to try anything more in-depth, but I'll keep > you posted. Do you mean "with an ipsec-tools 0.6.7 as the peer" ? It should work, as changes are only in the kernel/userland interface, and as (AFAIR) no changes have been done in the way NAT-T is negociated with the peer between ipsec-tools 0.6 and 0.7. Could you please give us more informations about that ? And what do you mean by "it takes some time to start working" ??? Thanks, Yvan.