From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 23 03:52:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8EE16A41F for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:52:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FE443D4C for ; Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B4D4CE7B7; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postoffice.vicor-nb.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 96444-06; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5464CE7B5; Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E1BEED.90003@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:52:13 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050629 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" References: <42E03812.4090801@elischer.org> <20050723033251.GB45516@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1122089684.12033.0.camel@tirun> In-Reply-To: <1122089684.12033.0.camel@tirun> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postoffice.vicor.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libcipher replacement X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 03:52:15 -0000 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: >On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:32 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > >>On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:04:34PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> >>>I have snet this mail 3 times and each time it never appeared on the list >>>(that I saw.. I think it got eaten by a spam filtrer somewhere..) >>> >>>trying again. >>> >>>Since setkey(3) has now gone away so thoroughly that there is not even >>>a manual page saying how to replace it, >>>I need to port some code that uses it.. >>> >>>What is the suggested replacement? >>> >>>Of course it is still on linux.. apparently in libcrypt. >>>but that doesn't help me keep this code on BSD.. >>> >>> >>> >>I've seen each of your previous post. Perhaps, you need >>to adjust your local mail filtering. >> >> yeah sorry about this.. may mail was apparently going into a black hole so I resent. then it all suddenly came out to haunt me.. > >Likewise. > >As to answers, I strongly suspect the openssl in base is the approved >replacement. > > so does openssl have setkey(3)? When the setkey() man page was removed it would have been nice to replace it with one explaining how to replace it with whatever is in ssl that does the same thing.