From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 10 13:57:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 5B7E2AA2; Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:57:10 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:57:10 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r346114 - head/devel/p4.el
Message-ID: <20140310135710.GA84398@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201402260657.s1Q6vEsH059562@svn.freebsd.org>
 <BEE32AF42CDC7ED09B7234F0@atuin.in.mat.cc>
 <20140226123420.f5c0d0ff40b404a70334da4b@FreeBSD.org>
 <20140310072423.GC11693@FreeBSD.org>
 <f8e85ff21f349babc099b00d8207a8b2@apnoea.adamw.org>
 <20140310133431.GA80620@FreeBSD.org>
 <1E3C943B0336A5069B281A2E@ogg.in.absolight.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1E3C943B0336A5069B281A2E@ogg.in.absolight.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org>,
 Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org>
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2014 13:57:10 -0000

On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:39:36PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> If you have changes in the pipes, please do consult portmgr@ before doing
> anything.

With all due respect Mathieu,

I'm not proposing (or trying to instate behind the back) anything moot,
controversial, or which is merely a matter of style.  Whenever I might
need a technical review, IMHO it should go to ports@ (or, perhaps, some
private list like ports-committers@) rather than portmgr@ (which is not,
and never was, a technical review board in the first place).

That said, doc@ people can of course ask for any feedback from portmgr@
if they want to.

./danfe