From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 21 18:30:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE8ED49481 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E509194D for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id m123so23696937wma.0 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:30:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MExLGfdgfNcTHQDzvEkD7HDobE+0K28mwRSP/zdAPGk=; b=C8VHhPFcFOAx5mjBABx7SWrpx5WR4zrra4pNQIK16e8KqIzZmlMWO8RHZ+lmFPgH3E urECSEPOhw4oamSD3naK9vKtih27sbUe3tWNBpGcomuU89n32Rj9LDZDDAQdV3Ne3O5u W8KNIqThzgVo4vcIZFhcYHXacdpTkmJ5iunM4x5UVSwV44b/dMWpzmsN1F61SPKYEI0p KOzkJwbtMIN1bH8E/UHNslWtwYorIZttWlRkbxTjUTLYgylmKvnkLIjkrcM54HX7BCvT +gvbQRKpbymZgnKwbgIVV9H3A1HEYT1rqVXT+1++dPpew1ycsoc4vOqbTfQ024w0cViT Cxmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=MExLGfdgfNcTHQDzvEkD7HDobE+0K28mwRSP/zdAPGk=; b=O+owkotjoP6i9V91s8DpYBYBMtZ3wx0HZaT4GlfObxrweoOZXIyZvOHmwjQBEOHQQZ xfCtUSObA6gLSpNvjEKAb8bVLdKh/RWwSKCJ1Dg3sv2LVWwaZUtryYjkfIclRbdBR1Q2 cXlhF6UGT6G627/6rykijAVGnQcIjloRxabDBwdXIxZ3ZqhrqMsQrzn4IY3LFlLgtTwY 3W8VTDcoF/4uR0jZ94agShkiJ0bpyEh+OP0MRxSBDCSbmsCXjdJvBBKnjN3TdBNXIeJs 2Uk9eHZ4/1EQ7YXCBSr7x00ITEyA8YVNigEHeVzBRfK1vGywc/uUvxvCHoXkWMycYJPh zzNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6Zv0AgroxEgcYf6O33yDGEe4NKeY3Tby/4Tc0t5woexlL6nZwd LY1FL+Cx/SUa+V7KtkT/3wVDMpA47g== X-Received: by 10.28.138.209 with SMTP id m200mr8514wmd.109.1492799406718; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.182.175 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:30:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: David Mehler Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:30:06 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: gnupg and gnupg2 To: User questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:30:08 -0000 Hello, Thanks. Here's the output. Can I get clamav-unofficial-sigs to link against gnupg and not gnupg1? Is this something the port should do? pkg info -r gnupg gnupg-2.1.20: spamassassin-3.4.1_10 pkg info -r gnupg1 gnupg1-1.4.21_3: clamav-unofficial-sigs-5.3.2_1 Thanks. Dave. On 4/21/17, Gerard Seibert wrote: > On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 20:46:58 -0400, Jim Ohlstein stated: > >> On Apr 20, 2017, 8:27 PM -0400, David Mehler , >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > I've got a 10.3 system. I just noticed I've got both gnupg 1.4 and >> > gnupg 2.0. My question is can I get rid of gnupg1 and use the >> > gnupg2? > >> They're both ports, not part of base. Evidently you have at least one >> port that relies on each. > > Perhaps running "pkg info -r gnupg20" > > and "pkg info -r gnupg1" might help. > > Actually, the latest version in port is "gnupg-2.1.20" You might be > able to remove the other two versions and just link to that one. > > -- > Carmel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >