From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Jan 15 2:58:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F17837B401 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 02:58:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id F3BF86A909 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:58:17 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010115115430.03cb4cc0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 11:56:39 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: RE: DNS redundancy & load balancing In-Reply-To: References: <3A63C980.92F7022@actweb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Indeed but clients have their primary DNS server set to our primary, thus if >our primary goes down no resolution takes place. >Clients have a their seconday DNS set to our secondary DNS, but we've found >that often M$ machines never even try looking at their secondary DNS server. >Any ideas ? Nice GUI, too bad about the program. :))) Yes, I have heard that MS resolvers don't really fall through to the 2nd+ DNS's that their GUI leads you to believe they will do. Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 T9B for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message