From owner-freebsd-ports  Mon Jun 11 23:11:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from dell.dannyland.org (dell.dannyland.org [64.81.36.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F71637B401
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:11:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from dannyman@toldme.com)
Received: by dell.dannyland.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 7467F5BFA; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:11:18 -0700
From: dannyman <dannyman@toldme.com>
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/28092: New port: p5-Net-DLookup
Message-ID: <20010611231118.B99398@toldme.com>
References: <200106120521.f5C5LeZ13816@noneedto.tellme.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200106120521.f5C5LeZ13816@noneedto.tellme.com>; from dannyman@tellme.com on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:21:40PM -0700
X-Loop: djhoward@uiuc.edu
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 10:21:40PM -0700, dannyman@tellme.com wrote:
> >Confidential:   yes

EEEGH!

I did this once before.  Must not delete the Confidential: line in
send-pr!

I note, though, that the bug then goes to a public list anyway.  (!!)

Can we make the default be Confidential: no?  Who should I flatter to
fix ports/28092? :)

Thanks,
-danny

-- 
http://dannyman.toldme.com/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message