From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Oct 8 02:31:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9397912C919; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 02:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46nLvk3Hrcz48Cb; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 02:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:5041:db:ea4e:51b9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D76425480; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 02:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:31:42 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: Mikhail Teterin , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r513969 - head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs Message-ID: <20191008023141.firlp3gvj6l2n5vu@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <201910071632.x97GWc1l048915@repo.freebsd.org> <20191007163545.GA36148@KGPE-D16> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191007163545.GA36148@KGPE-D16> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 02:31:46 -0000 I agree. If bumping PORTREVISION forgotten in the previous commit, why not explain that? On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 06:35:45PM +0200, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > I think this might need better explanation. > > On 19-10-07 16:32:38, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > > Author: mi > > Date: Mon Oct 7 16:32:38 2019 > > New Revision: 513969 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/513969 > > > > Log: > > Bump PORTREVISION. Because why not? > > > > Modified: > > head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/Makefile > > > > Modified: head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/Makefile > > ============================================================================== > > --- head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/Makefile Mon Oct 7 15:45:25 2019 (r513968) > > +++ head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/Makefile Mon Oct 7 16:32:38 2019 (r513969) > > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ > > > > PORTNAME= smbnetfs > > PORTVERSION= 0.6.1 > > -PORTREVISION= 2 > > +PORTREVISION= 3 > > CATEGORIES= sysutils net > > MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/${PORTNAME}/SMBNetFS-${PORTVERSION} > > PKGNAMEPREFIX= fusefs- -- meta