From owner-cvs-include  Tue Apr 21 09:01:05 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-include>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA01664
          for cvs-include-outgoing; Tue, 21 Apr 1998 09:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-include)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA01566;
          Tue, 21 Apr 1998 16:00:40 GMT
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA03500;
	Wed, 22 Apr 1998 02:00:27 +1000
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 1998 02:00:27 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199804211600.CAA03500@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: bde@zeta.org.au, brian@Awfulhak.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/include unistd.h
Cc: brian@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-cvs-include@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> Interface changes shouldn't be made in "stable" branches.  Especially
>> ones that only fix cosmetic bugs.
>
>Oh :-/
>
>Shall I back out then ?

Yes.

>I assume the rationale is so that any 
>existing software that uses unistd.h for these decls won't 
>suddenly break for no wonderfully good reason ?

That's my rationale.

Bruce