From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Apr 21 05:26:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA10094 for isp-outgoing; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 05:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA10089 for ; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 05:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (shovey@buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA21353; Mon, 21 Apr 1997 08:26:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 08:26:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve To: Hugh Blandford cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with Xylogics RA4000 In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970421113455.006b27ec@mail.island.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I couldnt get any release after 10.1 of the router kernal to work properly - in my case they rebooted themselves all the time. Bay is not helpful, they just do a good job of sounding helpful. Expand with different equipment - we are. On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Hugh Blandford wrote: > This is a little off topic but I'm sure that there is someone out there who > could be a bit more helpful than Bay are being. > > I am running Release 13.3 with rack mounting modems that do not provide > DSR. With control_lines set to modem control and need_dsr set to either > Y\N the annex is still expecting DSR to be active. When this is forced > manually (hardwired on the telco connector) the annex behaves as expected. > Basically this appears to be a problem with this release of the software as > version 9.2.7 works as published. > > Does anybody have any suggestions rather than rewiring all the connectors > or buying a Livingston Portmaster? :-) > > Regards, > > Hugh. >