From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 15 16:54:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD34816A4CE for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:54:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xraided.net (ns1.gadoz.com [66.88.26.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B55843D31 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kyle@xraided.net) Received: from [216.160.115.216] (account kyle HELO kyledesktop) by xraided.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 1906671 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:54:36 -0700 From: "Kyle Mott" To: Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 09:54:36 -0700 Message-ID: <001a01c4b2d7$a792e030$150ba8c0@kyledesktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <200410140102.21844.miha@ghuug.org> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Java 1.4.x + Tomcat5 + MySQL 4.x on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 16:54:40 -0000 Are there any more comments on this? My main concern is having a stable and fast Java implementation, even if that means using /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15 and/or /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 in 32bit emulation mode. -Kyle Mott > -----Original Message----- > From: Mikhail P. [mailto:miha@ghuug.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 6:02 PM > To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > Cc: Kyle Mott > Subject: Re: Java 1.4.x + Tomcat5 + MySQL 4.x on AMD64 > > On Wednesday 13 October 2004 22:55, Kyle Mott wrote: > > My 2 main concerns here are the stability and speed of Java and the > > speed of MySQL. Currently, I have to enable linuxthreads on 4-STABLE in > > order to get good performance out of MySQL. > > > > Comments? > > > We have an AMD64 box here, which is being used as a dedicated mysql server for > one large site. Server has the following hardware: > AMD Athlon64 3400+ > 1.5GB RAM > 18GB SCSI drive, spinning at 15k RPM > Adaptec's SCSI controller > > That server currently runs FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7-amd64. > MySQL is built from ports and linked against libkse. > > Just for comparison - > Before we got that server, we used P4 CPU @ 2.6Ghz, 1GB of RAM and SCSI drive > (10k RPM). Usually load was at 2.5-3 during the peak times. > Now with this AMD64 box, load does not go any higher than 0.80 during the peak > times. > > I can't comment on SMP-enabled Opterons, but AFAIK, libkse is broken there, > and mysql won't utilize both CPUs.. > > regards, > M.