From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 23 19:03:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE27116A416 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6605443D55 for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x37so919948nfc for ; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:03:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=J2LX+3IZyXW+PZRjoS5zH1aq5wuZj9ElkdxF7wjja9/QNIpfAMI3UQh//Yg+1Y/lPH0qc1mLnGWdM7sm27KIXgzqjFLjzei4R7S0lasrWNHQSu83tDVyEbPfhmApZDps+REAAPv065tpB9x+rUWaiuoMqO/HZoyQHdOK3+gnv6k= Received: by 10.49.43.2 with SMTP id v2mr4414557nfj.1164308605026; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:03:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from roadrunner.q.local ( [85.180.138.209]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r34sm5851693nfc.2006.11.23.11.03.24; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 11:03:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from roadrunner.q.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kANJ3Lo7009739; Thu, 23 Nov 2006 20:03:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Received: (from q@localhost) by roadrunner.q.local (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kAMKGPjs003604; Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:16:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from uspoerlein@gmail.com) Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 21:16:25 +0100 From: Ulrich Spoerlein To: Alan Cox Message-ID: <20061122201625.GC1522@roadrunner.q.local> Mail-Followup-To: Alan Cox , Kip Macy , arch@freebsd.org References: <45649E42.70409@cs.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45649E42.70409@cs.rice.edu> Cc: Kip Macy , arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: superpage plans X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:03:27 -0000 Alan Cox wrote: > Lastly, page coloring dies. However, the beneficial effects of page coloring are for the > most part captured by superpages. Specifically, regardless of whether the pmap is able to > promote a particular region of the address space to a superpage, e.g., due to heterogenous > access rights of pages within the region, if the memory has been provided by the reservation > system it will have "perfect" coloring. Hi Alan, what performance impact do you estimate for "older" processors? I know very little about superpages, so I assume that, e.g., earlier Pentiums don't support it? Where do you think the break off point lies? Ulrich Spoerlein -- A: Yes. >Q: Are you sure? > >A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. > >>Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?