From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 9 16:05:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6DA16A4CE; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:05:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ADE43D1D; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:05:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i59G3wlX043876; Wed, 9 Jun 2004 10:03:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:04:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040609.100413.118633043.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <53418.1086773585@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <200406090929.i599T8h6065944@repoman.freebsd.org> <53418.1086773585@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_proc.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 16:05:42 -0000 In message: <53418.1086773585@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <200406090929.i599T8h6065944@repoman.freebsd.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp : writes: : > : > Modified files: : > sys/kern kern_proc.c : > Log: : > Fix a race in destruction of sessions. : : Not to pick on anybody, but this is a perfect example of getting locking : almost right: : : BAD: : : LOCK(foo->lock) : foo->refcount--; : UNLOCK(foo->lock) : if (foo->refcount == 0) : destroy(foo); : : GOOD: : : LOCK(foo->lock) : i = --foo->refcount; : UNLOCK(foo->lock) : if (i == 0) : destroy(foo); : Can you provide a couple of lines about why BAD is BAD and why GOOD fixes that flaw? That should help others from making this mistake in the future. Warner