From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 20 11:30:03 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D72411065673
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30548FC21
	for <freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n4KBU3Fo087663
	for <freebsd-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:03 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n4KBU3Nm087658;
	Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:03 GMT
Message-Id: <200905201130.n4KBU3Nm087658@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: bin/134694: gives false-positive when unable to obtain socket
 [WAS: sshd(8) - alert user when fails to execute from rc.d]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:30:04 -0000

The following reply was made to PR bin/134694; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dimitry Andric <dimitry@andric.com>
To: Tobias Fendin <tobias.fendin@glocalnet.net>
Cc: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru, hackers@freebsd.org, 
 Glen Barber <glen.j.barber@gmail.com>,
 bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/134694: gives false-positive when unable to obtain socket
 [WAS: sshd(8) - alert user when fails to execute from rc.d]
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:27:02 +0200

 On 2009-05-20 13:18, Tobias Fendin wrote:
 > Does the child really die? I did a little test:
 > 
 > # /etc/rc.d/sshd status
 > sshd is not running.
 > # nc -l 22 >/tmp/ssh_test &
 > [1] 1733
 > # /etc/rc.d/sshd start
 > Starting sshd.
 > # /etc/rc.d/sshd status
 > sshd is running as pid 1740.
 
 This is because sshd binds to both IPv4 and IPv6 ports.  The IPv4 bind
 fails, as you will see in syslog, while the IPv6 bind succeeds.  Thus
 sshd keeps on running.
 
 If you start two nc's (I don't know any way to do this with one
 instance), e.g.:
 
 nc -4 -l 22 > /tmp/ssh_test4 &
 nc -6 -l 22 > /tmp/ssh_test6 &
 
 and then try starting sshd, you should see it quit.