Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2019 23:43:06 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239156] graphics/ImageMagick6-nox11 pulls in a lot of x11 stuff via graphics/cairo Message-ID: <bug-239156-6497-f1Wwe8JiSl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239156-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239156-6497@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239156 --- Comment #2 from Martin Waschb=C3=BCsch <martin@waschbuesch.de> --- (In reply to Ting-Wei Lan from comment #1) Thank you for the suggestion. I do know how to work around it when building= the package myself. My point was about expectations: Someone installing a -nox11 package will expect it to do just that. Instea= d, x11 + wayland gets installed. That just seems wrong to me. Also, someone using pkg (official packages, not poudriere) instead of ports does not have much of a choice. Thus, as I see it, there are three options to solve this: 1) Can the -nox11 ImageMagick packages as they pull in x11 stuff anyway. Th= at way at least no false expectations are raised. 2) Disable OPENGL, X11 and XCB per default for graphics/cairo since they re= sult in these dependencies. However, hoping that these options are set by default for a reason, that might break other packages depending on graphics/cairo providing these features. 3) Create a graphics/cairo-nox11 port with appropriate options unset so that the -nox11 ImageMagick packages can depend on that instead of graphics/cair= o. That way other packages are left untouched while being able to provide -nox= 11 ImageMagic packages that actually behave as advertised.=20 My preference would be for 3). One could leave it as is, however I tend to finding that unacceptable seein= g as you do not get what you expected when installing one of the -nox11 ImageMag= ic packages. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239156-6497-f1Wwe8JiSl>