From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 16 15:27:44 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C459E37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:27:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.acd.net (smtp.acd.net [207.179.64.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41E243F93 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 15:27:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from taxman@ACD.NET) Received: from 207.179.99.12 ([207.179.99.12]) by smtp.acd.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:27:30 -0500 From: taxman To: Tim Bishop , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: STABLE on a new production system Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 18:30:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030316215126.GA24916@raq15.uk2net.com> In-Reply-To: <20030316215126.GA24916@raq15.uk2net.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303161830.52720.taxman@acd.net> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Mar 2003 23:27:30.0770 (UTC) FILETIME=[9D519B20:01C2EC13] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday 16 March 2003 04:51 pm, Tim Bishop wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm about to start building a new production server (web and e-mail > mainly) and I'm pondering which version of FreeBSD to install. All my > other productions machines are running either -STABLE or in the most > important cases a security branch. I follow this list, so I'm confident > enough to run -STABLE :-) > > However, now FreeBSD 5.0 is out I'm unsure of what to install on a new > machine. I'm aware that 5.0 isn't geared towards production systems, > and I expect there could be some stability issues or problems building > ports. That said, if I opt for 4.8 it won't be that long until I'll be > looking at reinstalling/upgrading to get up to 5.2 and the new -STABLE. So yes but it likely won't be that bad to upgrade to 5.2 at that point.. The roadmaps currently are thinking the 5-stable branch won't start till August or Sept. See the Status Report that Scott Long posts to the list and the 5 roadmap listed there: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/5-roadmap > maybe just opting for 5.0 and bearing with it for the coming months is > the way to go? Well if the instabilities, experimentation, and resulting downtime and extra admin time figuring out problems are not a big deal to you then go ahead. You'll get all the new goodies from 5.x But if you've already got everything you need in 4.x, then you may want to stay there. 5.x is also currently slower. Usually the best practice is to test it out on a non important machine on the side. That way you can learn the new features and see if it suits your needs. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message