From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 19 3: 0:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8EC37B400 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 03:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g2JB0An41554; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 03:00:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 03:00:10 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203191100.g2JB0An41554@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jedi/Sector One Subject: Re: ports/36062: Update port: ftp/pure-ftpd (to 1.0.10) Reply-To: Jedi/Sector One Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/36062; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jedi/Sector One To: Peter Pentchev Cc: "Jedi/Sector One (Frank DENIS)" , Alex Dupre , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/36062: Update port: ftp/pure-ftpd (to 1.0.10) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:52:55 +0059 On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:02:05PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > How does this sit with the port maintainer, who also happens to be > the author of pure-ftpd? :) Frank, is a version and distinfo change > enough, or should some other things be done to the FreeBSD port? Sorry for the late answer. That's ok, Peter, you can apply the patch. There are no big change in 1.0.10, and no new translation, no new file to add to the port, and no configuration change. So updating the distfile/version# is ok. Thanks you, -Frank. -- __ /*- Frank DENIS (Jedi/Sector One) -*\ __ \ '/ Secure FTP Server \' / \/ Misc. free software \/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message