From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Nov 27 15: 9:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo.feral.com [192.67.166.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922737B417 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:09:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from wonky.feral.com (wonky.feral.com [192.67.166.7]) by beppo.feral.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id fARN9bW77347; Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:09:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 15:09:37 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: Warner Losh , Dima Dorfman , Subject: Re: Anybody working on devd? In-Reply-To: <20011127165713.S75389@prism.flugsvamp.com> Message-ID: <20011127150929.R5474-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:43:37PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > But pccard doesn't deal in terms of dev_t, but rather device_t. The > > pccard bus system has no earthly clue what you just added to the > > system. Plus, unless jlemon has been busy, the network drivers do not > > add dev_t's. > > You rang? :-) > > Yes, -current has a dev_t for network devices, if that makes any difference. required or optional? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message