From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 22 12:13:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mail.af.airnet.ne.jp (mail.af.airnet.ne.jp [210.159.66.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFF2155B2 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 12:13:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imura@cs.titech.ac.jp) Received: from imura.cs.titech.ac.jp (tok294.airnet.ne.jp [210.159.89.38]) by mail.af.airnet.ne.jp (8.8.8/3.6W/06/13/98-AF.AIRNET.NE.JP) with ESMTP id FAA11282; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 05:13:01 +0900 Posted-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 05:12:16 +0900 (JST) To: andrews@technologist.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, ade@lovett.com Subject: Re: ports/15434: new port: devel/kdevelop From: "R. Imura" In-Reply-To: References: <19991216033056A.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b20 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQkt2RSYyVhsoQik=?= X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19991223051215U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 05:12:15 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990401(IM113) Lines: 23 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On 15-Dec-99 R. Imura wrote: > >> > o The port depends on many other ports. Year, if they are installed, > >> > kdevelop will be more power-full and we will be happy, but they are > >> > not really **nessesary**. > > > > It would be. But I meant the following optional RUN_DEPENDS. :) > > > > RUN_DEPENDS= autoconf:${PORTSDIR}/devel/autoconf \ > > You're both wrong. _THIS_ must be installed for kdevelop to serve any useful > purpose at all. Although the rest _are_ optional. ;-) You are right! What about automake? # I must modify my port. > I am still waiting to hear (valid) reasons why the kdelibs11/qt142 ports have > not been upgraded. You had better send all related patches, if you want. --- R. Imura To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message