From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed May 28 11:00:25 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DB937B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72A5C43F93
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com)
Received: (qmail 8271 invoked by uid 1000); 28 May 2003 18:00:25 -0000
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@netbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030528105853.M8236@root.org>
References: <20030527140327.E6550@root.org>
	<20030528071116.2db41659.yosimoto@waishi.jp>
	<20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: acpi-jp@jp.FreeBSD.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:00:25 -0000

On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's,
> I think.
>
> Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0,
> otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict.
>
> I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel,
> but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the
> changes are intended).
>
> Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> some appropriate option.

Thank you for the patch.  Since we are only days away from a release, I
would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead
stick to hard-coding the defaults.  This is the safer way for 5.1R.  We
will do a new import and more fixes after the release.

-Nate