From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 2 04:51:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8906A106566B; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 04:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) Received: from smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (smtp-sofia.digsys.bg [193.68.3.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A6698FC0A; Sat, 2 Jun 2012 04:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.68.136.207] (digsys207-136.pip.digsys.bg [193.68.136.207]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp-sofia.digsys.bg (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q524otEd017277 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:50:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from daniel@digsys.bg) References: <20120601121555.GF5335@home.opsec.eu> <4FC8B67D.5090208@digsys.bg> <20120601131236.GJ8591@macbook.bluepipe.net> <20120602010346.GA27660@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> <4D744565-4073-485E-B769-82BE1F7E2C0A@ee.ryerson.ca> <20120602032529.GE1377@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <5C21CA77-966F-4012-9D32-9507ABAD6747@digsys.bg> X-Mailer: iPad Mail (9B206) From: Daniel Kalchev Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 07:51:03 +0300 To: Freddie Cash Cc: Glen Barber , David Magda , "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 04:51:00 -0000 On 02.06.2012, at 07:19, Freddie Cash wrote: >=20 > Glustre sits above the storage system, replicating data between systems. > So, disks -- ZFS (via Zvols) -- Glustre. >=20 How is this different than ZFS using remote zvols via iSCSI? Can it tolerate= down nodes better than ZFS? Daniel=