From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 16:53:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A74A106567B for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435708FC0A for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:53:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id mAIGnmXe028882; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:49:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id mAIGnms2028881; Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:49:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 11:49:47 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Dan Message-ID: <20081118164947.GF28439@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <7f8a05a80811171609h2f5742cfo2ae003415a99e45f@mail.gmail.com> <20081118121634.S84157@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081118154226.GA20147@ourbrains.org> <20081118165011.G84987@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081118155448.GC20147@ourbrains.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081118155448.GC20147@ourbrains.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: FreeBSD and hardware?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 16:53:59 -0000 On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:54:48AM -0500, Dan wrote: > Wojciech Puchar(wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)@2008.11.18 16:51:16 +0100: > >> > >> Have you used, erm... Linux? Both Linux and FreeBSD run pretty much at > >> hardware level. You benchmark either, you'll get very close results in > > > > for benchmarks doing same thing over and over, or same thing in parallel > > linux can even be better. > > > > but try running many different tasks in parallel under linux. FreeBSD > > flies, while linux chokes. > > Can you point out some places on the web that confirm this? > I can't point this out between Linux and FreeBSD, but back a few years ago, when I was involved in benchmarking high performance systems for purchase here, we found this to often be the case. Some systems just screamed on certain very parallel tasks, but practically came to a halt when a mix of tasks were run or even when trying to edit a script while things were running. Others were slightly less hot on the highly specialized tasks, but did well - much better - on the mix. We chose the system that handled the mix - which ran a BSD UNIX by the way, although a proprietary version as did most back then. Anyway, so, even though I haven't compared FreeBSD and Linux, I am not surprised to hear someone say there is this sort of difference. It is possible. Someone might investigate further and put out some verifiable numbers. ////jerry > > > > that's why i don't like benchmarks. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"