From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 11 11:45:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:45:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (ux11.ltcm.net [64.215.98.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B3E43D2F for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ibb.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1]) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id j1BBix95020779 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:45:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j1BBiwu1018540 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:44:59 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: ux11.ltcm.net: mipam owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 12:44:58 +0100 (MET) From: Mipam X-X-Sender: mipam@ux11.ltcm.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: using ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES savely? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:45:02 -0000 Hi, Does anybody run with the kernel option ADAPTIVE_MUTEXES in RELENG_5 yet? Is it safe to use or should be used with care? Anybody also using INVARIANTS? The networking stack is already mpsafe i guess, at least by default on RELENG_5 i notice: debug.mpsafenet: 1 The em driver is also giant free or not yet? Bye, Mipam.