From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 16 07:47:28 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EDDC16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:47:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C055743D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:47:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from clint@0lsen.net)
Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP
          id <20050116074725016006oskqe>; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:47:25 +0000
Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 87627172B0; Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:47:24 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 23:47:24 -0800
From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <20050116074724.GA72796@0lsen.net>
References: <20050116013239.GA84616@0lsen.net>
	<20050116041659.GA62683@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050116041659.GA62683@xor.obsecurity.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Organization: NULlsen Network
X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites!
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portversion claims a newer port is available but it ain't so
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 07:47:28 -0000

On Jan 15, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> But the ports tree *does* have 1.1.0_4.  You probably did 'make
> fetchindex', which works against the latest ports tree.  cvsup and you'll
> get the update.

Actually, I didn't do a make fetchindex, but it seems as if portversion
does this at times.  At any rate, you were right.  Running cvsup pulls down
the latest port.

-Clint