From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Oct 17 9:54:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B9FA37B4D7 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:54:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA10041; Tue, 17 Oct 2000 18:54:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: mjacob@feral.com Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I'm convinced 'gcc' is meant to be pronounced 'ARRRRGGGHHH!' References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Oct 2000 18:54:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: Matthew Jacob's message of "Tue, 17 Oct 2000 09:32:41 -0700 (PDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Jacob writes: > > Will someone please inform the gcc developers of the last decade's > > advances in C standardization? Yes, Virginia, ISO C (it's not ISO C > > any more, and hasn't been since 1989) does support 'long long' and the > > 'll' format. > Eh? 'gcc -pedantic' generates a warning for every use of the 'long long' type or the 'll' printf format modifier, incorrectly stating that they are not supported in ANSI C. C99 (which includes 'long long' and the 'll' format modifier) has been in the works for most of the previous decade, and was ratified (as ISO/IEC 9899:1999) on December 16th, 1999, but gcc still seems to live in 1989-land. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message