Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:12:52 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Nate Williams <nate@sri.MT.net> Cc: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>, stable@freebsd.org, wollman@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arp and async problems Message-ID: <199602151912.LAA07155@Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 15 Feb 1996 11:21:43 MST." <199602151821.LAA00383@rocky.sri.MT.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > > There is no way I can afford to split out 14 subnets with only one address >> > > in each to support a DNS and WWW server nor is it practical to stick that >> > > many ethernet cards into the box. >> >> > Why split it out? Why not stick all of the alias' on the same network, >> > so that the IP address are relevant on your primary network? >> >> So you're telling me that I can now use .. >> >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 >> ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 alias netmask 255.255.255.240 >> : >> : >> >> .. this didn't work before (I tried it), does it now ? I think the above should be: ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.225 netmask 255.255.255.240 ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.226 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig ep0 inet 202.12.127.227 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias -DG David Greenman Core Team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602151912.LAA07155>