Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Apr 1995 14:42:05 -0700
From:      Gary Palmer (FreeBSD/ARM Team) <gpalmer@freefall.cdrom.com>
To:        Scott Mace <smace@metal-mail.neosoft.com>
Cc:        ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: tcl/tk/tclX/dp/incr-tcl/etc 
Message-ID:  <27518.798932525@freefall.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Apr 95 15:15:57 MDT." <199504262115.PAA02299@metal.ops.neosoft.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199504262115.PAA02299@metal.ops.neosoft.com>, Scott Mace writes:
>What do yall think about integrating all of them into 2 binaries:
>tcl and wishx.  This is what I (NeoSoft) uses, and is a much more 
>complete environment.

Ask the maintainers of the ORIGIONAL tarballs to do this. Ports is (IMNSHO)
meant to be a collection of PATCHED sources so that they work on FreeBSD 2.x,
not a collections of ports of software in the form which we'd like to
see them. The ports tree is meant to be a small, light set of makefiles,
patches & support files, which this re-write would certainly not be
AFAIK.

Gary



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27518.798932525>