From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 22:56:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CA81065672; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heliocentric@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93328FC18; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from heliocentric@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id j71so6774169rne.12 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:56:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Qi613Rj49aemWFZuPpL47/K25bgPpzaK5qT3X80GVAQ=; b=i+Bzv0FhR8XUaaIyBXuFoXL1hX2TRYG1slD+9abitjggB1DEiszncgWMXpSidxFarb TN7PPZSrQP4lIZUsdWLbqbyUo5DC9snD+bWMWGHUnVCEiQLM1shesWVb5+X8fStL/GcQ JnLvESlEWYeaKfpiiiZB6Ec0uSFSdsmeaWan4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=QZU7Reog18N94vl/q7AuDTQWsfwwhdholFkvDmzr+Qrkqbvs0GAaEj8sFP39tTExG2 7EJylHUKxr4MRioQ6pK0C36/LC3crv9MqaKaFiTT76ligcsfgNLJt8ZHPic1ur5dgaiJ kuLz0PgejoA5+OCWKOwPEGdVhrucEEGAtgvTU= Received: by 10.90.102.8 with SMTP id z8mr12885934agb.56.1231628165879; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.36.7 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:56:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:56:05 -0500 From: a134qaed@gmail.com To: "Tim Kientzle" In-Reply-To: <4968EF7E.5040002@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4965927D.1060507@freebsd.org> <4968EF7E.5040002@freebsd.org> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:38:26 +0000 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Extattr portability? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:56:07 -0000 On 1/10/09, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Dylan Cochran wrote: >> > > Wonderful! Care to help test? Absolutely. > > There's still a lot of open questions about the system > namespace I'll have to figure out. Over on the GNU tar > mailing list, the Linux filesystem folks have been agitating > for GNU tar to support system extattrs that carry filesystem > layout hints. The portability issues with this make my > head hurt. Yea, I think in the end it's going to be inherently un-portable, as in some systems, the system attributes could be filesystem or kernel specific. And I can forsee some dangerous reprocussions (a collision on an attribute name in the system namespace, which on one system is just a tag, like 'page=23', but on another, it's interpreted as a flagged hint to the dynamic linker, on how to page in the file..... > > Tim >