From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan  9 14:37:27 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1A71065673
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 14:37:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7578FC1B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 14:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 914A356172; Mon,  9 Jan 2012 08:37:26 -0600 (CST)
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 08:37:26 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120109143726.GA3185@lonesome.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CACqU3MWpV37+mbycW83t2mfTKQXWS7FaD8DYVrXySMKwFeyaqw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: FreeBSD current mailing list <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: stable/9 still looking for packages at 9-current
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:37:27 -0000

> On 9. Jan 2012, at 01:04 , Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> So you are saying that FreeBSD is currently providing on
> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub images tagged as being "9.0 RELEASE" (with
> checksum provided), in a `releases' directory, which are not actually
> release images per-se ?

Excellent!  You've shown the ability to understand flat, declarative,
sentences that have no qualifying phrases.

9.0 will be *released* when and only when the official, signed, email
goes out.  Everything up until that point is preparation.

mcl