From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 19 21:39:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708DC16A41C; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:39:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4799143D1F; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:39:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j5JLdSxC022293; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:39:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id j5JLdS62022291; Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:39:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 14:39:28 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20050619213927.GA18943@dragon.NUXI.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Daniel Eischen References: <66959.1119209763@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Summary: experiences with NanoBSD, successes and nits on a Soekris 4801 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2005 21:39:29 -0000 On Sun, Jun 19, 2005 at 04:22:23PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > How about NO_FOO[_INSTALL], where NO_FOO = no build and no install, > and NO_FOO_INSTALL just prevents the install. In theory, you could > build the complete system, then use NO_FOO_INSTALL instead of rm(1). Why not 'make buildworld ; make -DNO_FOO installworld'? Won't that do the same thing with out littering up the Makefiles with NO_FOO_INSTALL knobs? (there are clean ways of adding NO_FOO_INSTALL programaically, but that will take a little overhaul to do) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)