From owner-freebsd-security Tue Feb 2 20:06:50 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA07442 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 20:06:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spike.snickers.org (snickers.org [209.167.224.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA07421 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 20:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sygma@snickers.org) Received: from spike (sygma@spike [209.167.224.2]) by spike.snickers.org (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA23771 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:18:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 2 Feb 1999 23:18:12 -0500 (EST) From: Jon Nistor To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tcpdump In-Reply-To: <9575.918011566@zippy.cdrom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org # network pseudo-devices pseudo-device bpfilter 8 # Berkeley packet filter 8 from NetBSD, hah high number =) ._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._. Jon Nistor http://www.snickers.org/ nistor@snickers.org ICQ: 1429373 Network Operations FP: 66 3F 1B 23 C0 AA 40 IRC: sygma/efnet #snickers On Tue, 2 Feb 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: -OK, time to raise this topic again. What to people think about -enabling bpfilter by default in GENERIC? - -And before everyone screams "That would not be BSD!" let me just -note that NetBSD and probably OpenBSD (haven't looked) already do -this. - -- Jordan - -To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org -with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message