From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 07:24:26 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id HAA08406 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 07:24:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zeus.anet-stl.com (tbrown@users.anet-stl.com [206.114.203.16]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id HAA08401 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 07:24:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (tbrown@localhost) by zeus.anet-stl.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA27011 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 09:19:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 1997 09:19:51 -0600 (CST) From: Timothy Brown To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: timezone stuff (2.2-BETA) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Question: Windows 95 boots up. It tells me the time is proper (9am or whatever). FreeBSD boots up. It has the CST timezone installed, so it interprets the time at, like, 2am or something. The question is (and I know this is an easy hack, humour me): is this the intended behaviour? If I was just running FreeBSD, this would be fine, but i'm not... I know I can always hack out the timezone stuff, or just install GMT... Am I making any sense? Tim -- Timothy Brown, Web Architect/Network Engineer, ANET-STL Affiliation given for identification, not representation. http://www.anet-stl.com/~tbrown/