From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 15 12:54:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EE716A4CE for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lithium.plan-ix.de (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B88F43D1D for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 12:54:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from braukmann@tse-online.de) Received: from localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069462EC68B; Sat, 15 May 2004 19:54:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.plan-ix.de ([212.37.39.35]) by localhost (lithium.plan-ix.de [212.37.39.35]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id 17756-01; Sat, 15 May 2004 19:54:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.225.100] (p508243AB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.130.67.171]) by lithium.plan-ix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874D82EC333; Sat, 15 May 2004 19:54:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 21:54:11 +0200 From: Andreas Braukmann To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <228480000.1084650851@cage.int.unixxinu.de> In-Reply-To: <20040515151158.Q13297@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040515151158.Q13297@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at plan-ix.de cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: COMPAT4X and 5.x ... how backwards compatible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 19:54:14 -0000 On 05/15/04 15:14:18 -0300 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > move an existing jail'd environment over to there and run it, with the 4.x > binaries/libraries inside of the jail? Is this "wishful thinking" on my > part, that this would be possible? It's possible, but you have to test thoroughly. I run a complete 2.2.6 system (a few patches to the rc-scripts and a few binaries from 4.x) jailed on a 4.9 server. On a 5.2.1 server I run a jailed 3.2 as well as a jailed ca. 4.6. -Andreas