Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 02:34:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Michal Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/40408: scrolkeeper build fails at patching problems - docbook problem Message-ID: <200207100934.g6A9YOM4034637@www.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 40408
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: scrolkeeper build fails at patching problems - docbook problem
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: high
>Responsible: freebsd-ports
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Wed Jul 10 02:40:01 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Michal Pasternak
>Release: 4.6
>Organization:
>Environment:
doesn't matter
>Description:
docbook-xsl is included in scrollkeeper's makefile.
docbook-xml is _NOT_. it is included from docbook-xsl makefile, but is _NOT_ installed as a dependency and causes scrollkeeper build to fail.
>How-To-Repeat:
cd /usr/ports/textproc/scrollkeeper
make
[...]
===> Patching for scrollkeeper-0.3.9,1
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for scrollkeeper-0.3.9,1
backing up XML Catalog root /usr/local/share/xml/catalog
backing up XML Catalog /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog
creating XML Catalog root /usr/local/share/xml/catalog
creating DocBook XML Catalog /usr/local/share/xml/docbook/catalog
could not locate docbookx.dtd for DocBook XML
>Fix:
Please correct the dependencies. I'm not submitting a patch, because
I don't have knowledge to say whether docbook-xml should be a dependency of scrollkeeper or docbook-xsl.
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200207100934.g6A9YOM4034637>