From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 26 23:11:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06AC3106564A; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coder@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82F18FC08; Sat, 26 May 2012 23:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (unknown [88.184.221.231]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BAFA6185; Sun, 27 May 2012 01:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4FC1630C.7070808@tuxfamily.org> Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 01:11:08 +0200 From: "coder.tuxfamily" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120502 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rainer Hurling References: <4FBA9620.3020207@gwdg.de> <4FBA997C.6010000@tuxfamily.org> <4FBAA203.90201@gwdg.de> <4FBAA388.1070906@tuxfamily.org> <4FBB24D3.4010209@gwdg.de> <4FBBC3F2.4050104@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBC504.5010305@gwdg.de> <4FBBD7B4.5090505@tuxfamily.org> <4FBBFADA.6010700@gwdg.de> <4FBD0797.9040803@gwdg.de> <4FBD0EE2.9050703@tuxfamily.org> <4FBD122E.9030606@gwdg.de> <4FBF4303.8020501@gwdg.de> <4FBFE2B8.5000601@tuxfamily.org> <4FBFF060.9070706@gwdg.de> <4FC0FB76.2070702@tuxfamily.org> <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> In-Reply-To: <4FC107D7.5060905@gwdg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdal 1.9.1 (Was Re: graphics/gdal 1.9.0 does not build on CURRENT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2012 23:11:18 -0000 Le 26.05.2012 18:41, Rainer Hurling a écrit : > On 26.05.2012 17:49 (UTC+2), coder.tuxfamily wrote: >> Le 25.05.2012 22:49, Rainer Hurling a écrit : >>> On 25.05.2012 21:51 (UTC+1), coder.tuxfamily wrote: >>>> Can you try to build the "new" port of gdal ? >>>> >>>> I have the same problem with swig for php... >>> >>> Thanks for the update. It builds and installs fine here on two boxes >>> with 10.0-CURRENT (amd64). >>> >>> One issue which should be thought about before updating gdal in the >>> ports: >>> >>> Does gdal-1.9.1 really needs swig 2.0? It seems so for at least libkml? >>> >>> The problem is, that in your Makefile swig 2.0 conflicts with an >>> installed swig 1.3.40, which is needed for example by graphics/geos, >>> graphics/graphviz, math/saga, science/py-scipy and some others. >>> >>> Affected ports can be found for example with >>> find /usr/ports -name Makefile -depth 3 -exec grep -l -e "swig13" {} \; >>> >>> I personally would prefer the newer swig 2.0 version (even for most >>> other ports). Do you think it is necessary to forbid a parallel swig >>> 1.3.40 installation in your port? I read somewhere that both swig ports >>> can coexist in principle, only some docs share the same places (which >>> should be changed, of course). >>> >> >> Maybe you're right. I've see on trac.osgeo.org that it uses swig-1.3.40. >> I will try without specify version of swig. > > I saw in the news on http://www.swig.org/, that swig 2.0.6 is out with > many bug fixes and enhancements for templates and target languages like > php and python. Perhaps swig 2.0.6 is ready now for gdal? > > I just checked, that swig 1.3.40 and 2.0.4 should be able to coexist at > the same time. At least they do not share any filenames. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Ruby option seems have also a problem with SWIG. PGSQL conflict with ssl. I need to add condition between podofo and poppler.