From owner-freebsd-questions Sat May 1 9:33:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E680151CF for ; Sat, 1 May 1999 09:33:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from mips.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id SAA24084 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 1 May 1999 18:33:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de) Received: by mips.rhein-neckar.de id m10dbJy-000WyeC (Debian Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #2); Sat, 1 May 1999 17:04:50 +0200 (CEST) From: naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: Re: what is you favorite shell? Date: 1 May 1999 17:04:47 +0200 Message-ID: <7gf56f$ugi$1@mips.rhein-neckar.de> References: <19990428165736.5E70F153A8@hub.freebsd.org> <37283198.CA8D9F08@tellique.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Juergen Nickelsen wrote: > On the other hand, if it had command and > filename completion, I'd switch to /bin/sh. Check out pdksh, which is substantially less bloated than bash and less featureful for interactive use, but does have command and filename completion. (OpenBSD uses pdksh as /bin/sh.) -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de 100+ SF Book Reviews: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message