From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 18 17:44:10 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2793841
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:44:10 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from davide.damico@contactlab.com)
Received: from mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it
 (mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it [93.94.37.7])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D193D0B
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:44:09 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=contactlab.it; s=clab1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 q=dns/txt; i=@contactlab.it; t=1363628649;
 h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
 bh=MI9T3+J2COwwM19HFb3ZWCFdH3SfAOWxm3eEQq1pBA0=;
 b=RWEL125z+LFK+jdIfLnQbgPu/mE8by6FMTl60KBAqc4x/reIh3ZKiOromFOggyUi
 1WIQsvt6ekcks+hd4krBWCc+e1RVKqHANXkTN8IN6DRorzCNQuHXX2c25pQaKdAy
 9C5ivRQlCZuypqLMmnlII+rQz4iPWF8q4e5rX5k2kE0=;
Received: from [213.92.90.12] ([213.92.90.12:32069] helo=mail3.tomato.it)
 by t.contactlab.it (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>)
 (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP
 id 72/F7-24145-96257415; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:44:09 +0100
Received: from mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan ([172.16.7.55])
 by mail3.tomato.it with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>) id 1UHe6S-0005X6-Ty
 for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:44:09 +0100
Received: (qmail 21268 invoked by uid 89); 18 Mar 2013 17:44:08 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO davepro.local) (127.0.0.1)
 by mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan with SMTP; 18 Mar 2013 17:44:08 -0000
Message-ID: <51475267.1050204@contactlab.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:44:07 +0100
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Subject: Re: FreBSD 9.1 and ZFS v28 performances
References: <514729BD.2000608@contactlab.com>
 <810E5C08C2D149DBAC94E30678234995@multiplay.co.uk>
 <51473D1D.3050306@contactlab.com>
 <1DD6360145924BE0ABF2D0979287F5F4@multiplay.co.uk>
 <51474F2F.5040003@contactlab.com>
 <E106A7DB08744581A08C610BD8A86560@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <E106A7DB08744581A08C610BD8A86560@multiplay.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:44:10 -0000

Il 18/03/13 18:42, Steven Hartland ha scritto:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Davide D'Amico"
> <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
>
>>> So RAID10 on just 6 disks in effect just 3 active spindles? If so
>>> then your
>>> throughput of 400MB/s is about right.
>> Well, my RAID10 is on 4 disk (2 spindle) so do I have 400MB/s (3GBps)
>> because the max throughput is 6Gbps?
>
> You'll be limited by the actual disks. For your disks this is stated
> as 122 to 204MB/s sustained. So if your getting 400MB/s your doing well :)
>

Thanks, now it's clear.

d.