From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 12 14:36: 1 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from imo-m04.mx.aol.com (imo-m04.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8941137B401 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:35:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Bsdguru@aol.com) Received: from Bsdguru@aol.com by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31.7.) id y.110.240247e (4240); Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:35:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Bsdguru@aol.com Message-ID: <110.240247e.287f722d@aol.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:35:41 EDT Subject: Re: Intel ISP1100 or similar 1U experience with 4.3 stable To: carock@epconline.net, isp@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 139 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In a message dated 07/12/2001 1:54:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time, carock@epconline.net writes: > You said below while dirtbagging this guy's comments.... > > > cpu. Yes they > > will run, and may never fail, but they are not as reliable as 2U > > units which > > Hmmm, run and never fail. Sounds like the definition of reliable to me..! > > Are you having a bad day? > If you think that a 5% failure rate is reliable (which implies that 95% dont) then you are quite the engineer. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message