From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 26 12:39:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3C11065670; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35388FC18; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:39:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5QCdIbG001420; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:39:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q5QCdI2d001417; Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:39:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:39:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Robert Watson In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:39:18 +0200 (CEST) Cc: bp@freebsd.org, Arnaud Lacombe , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Current , kby@freebsd.org, Chris Rees Subject: Re: sysctl filesystem ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:39:29 -0000 > and/or get it wrong. sysctl has some file-system like properties, but on the > whole, it's not a file system -- it's much more like an SNMP MIB. > > While you can map anything into anything (including Turing machines), I think > the sysctl command line tool and API, despite its limitations, is a better me too. i REALLY appreciate the way FreeBSD do this. pseudo-filesystems are sometimes good but making them default method is bad. Current way is simple. Or actually - less complicated as i think for example - XML in system output is not.