From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sun Apr 24 15:49:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C0AB196E7 for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com (mail-pf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4227F1E71; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:49:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yaneurabeya@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 206so8326693pfu.0; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:49:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rJz9s6DMOMpVGO3ap2A2CZp9ij60nG1QWmlOjstHk4A=; b=H4rbKXrvercvGcx1Lo09L/ldn3/P8HmkdvnPNsHy1ewnVLi57tMk6ggI4E37xWQAE3 c/AbpQ/2BXG2e6Q2hZjnF5MFVZmLECQZg/eQco8dkld9AI/BpgSyj5GBeCfo+J5nUPFY CGysYIuQ5HI8EWJHia5FPHxYgpRNQLzdS2qZro6vO5UVdrJ2YeS4AzyIQIe8BPy/4JT9 II/iAqrXvUdkK/+13v5v+pMYPFLKLc9lWW+3F7UV4/trk/Cepv+A48UEKvS+8XW5IHvb uzPHD/XYFBSZNaYJ5qkJWmz+R8r7J9rMO4dPmP2uKmVdysJyLGgnQD9rQSukwsYLqjIa 0aww== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rJz9s6DMOMpVGO3ap2A2CZp9ij60nG1QWmlOjstHk4A=; b=mW7R4cHK7UfZhWLAi3qL46xQ0zhkz/QLmSDTiGGlwycDabg0gx9khbZuooZw86Szi6 YZafoPARksRHsVb0oNM5KLlJzhP6BS+SeUAO5125oBi/3LTF9dYocUcd6IsZOz9UNBnf 2k5szVgY8TgQZ0HdeMHyVVRrSq7sgbfTqTAfPXCyL8wkfKBEM4+5lqJQ1/EBhCpkirUS i7OnRALdGmXMsiJ9Huc96ZsMnxj1bAYT+HxgXJu9hlTA8JJOs+QcUS13+zCvZt3ik7YD TNzi/bXh90tAwQpzqBuziUCq8ZohzAV6mmCLkMTLztXBD92vZBwEQQ4mnBxTNkaO6ELD 0jXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXLJbog4qeq5ZObg0DGnauU7sWnPzkqwjrKoJ9yWjdlT9DNF+9mirbXeDm4jvZ0HQ== X-Received: by 10.98.23.150 with SMTP id 144mr38598265pfx.96.1461512975525; Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:49:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.20.14] (c-73-97-222-46.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [73.97.222.46]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 17sm21766562pfp.96.2016.04.24.08.49.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: NanoBSD (Was Re: [CFT] packaging the base system with pkg(8)) From: NGie Cooper X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:49:33 -0700 Cc: Warner Losh , FreeBSD Current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <76093.1461096570@critter.freebsd.dk> <5716AD65.8070007@shrew.net> To: Daniel Eischen X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 15:49:36 -0000 > On Apr 24, 2016, at 05:34, Daniel Eischen wrote: >=20 >> On Sat, 23 Apr 2016, Warner Losh wrote: >>=20 >> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Daniel Eischen >> wrote: >>=20 >>> [CC trimmed] >>>=20 >>>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> I personally will be refraining from engaging further. I plan on seeing= >>>> what gaps there are by adding support to NanoBSD for packages. I'll be >>>> busy >>>> with that. In talking to Glen and others, we've already identified a fe= w >>>> easy gaps to fill. Once they've done that, I'll get going on NanoBSD wi= th >>>> the goal to be able to use it to build a bootable system of any >>>> architecture from packages with no root privs. I expect to find issues,= >>>> but >>>> I don't expect to find any issue that's intractable. I expect after the= >>>> issues are resolved, the end product will be better for everybody. >>>=20 >>> Thank you for working on NanoBSD. Do you think it would be possible >>> to add support for optionally building dump(8) images instead of dd? >>=20 >>=20 >> What do you mean by that, exactly? It would be relatively easy to add >> a step that runs dump on the _.disk.image file and squirrel that away. >> Last orders the code currently calls it, I believe. Is it something as >> simple >> as this, or is there some more complexity that I'm failing to understand >> or grasp? >=20 > Perhaps I'm missing something, but when last_orders() is called, > isn't the disk already unmounted and 'mdconfig -d -u' already > run? Yup. > --=20 > DE > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=