From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 23:11:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26EAF16A41F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:11:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116F443D55 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:10:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAMN9nHW038052; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:09:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id jAMN9lbP038049; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:09:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:09:47 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20051122212111.GA72725@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20051123000749.N37502@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <4383561C.30900@buc.com.ua> <20051122212111.GA72725@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Dmytro Surovtsev , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 GENERIC Kernel perfomance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:11:53 -0000 > It's only your own opinion until you share with us the measurements > that led you to conclude this. FreeBSD 6.0 is much faster than > FreeBSD 5.4 in my measurements, especially in the area of filesystem > performance. exactly same conclusion here! without even any precise benchmarking, just as i see doing same things that i used in both FreeBSD 5.4, and NetBSD 2.0. Not mentioning linux that is sometimes even faster with... one process.. (and only sometimes)