From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Dec 17 16:57:25 1996
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA05159
          for ports-outgoing; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:57:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com [206.214.98.3])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id QAA05154
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:57:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (ala-ca19-03.ix.netcom.com [205.187.212.35]) by dfw-ix3.ix.netcom.com (8.6.13/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA20775; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:56:49 -0800
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.4/8.6.9) id QAA02797; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 16:56:26 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199612180056.QAA02797@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: ejs@bfd.com
CC: ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.3.95.961217155825.15868A-100000@harlie> (ejs@bfd.com)
Subject: Re: Will Qt be updated in time for 2.2?
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * layouts.  With this in mind, I think it's important that Qt 1.1 makes it
 * into 2.2, because I suspect most people are going to write their code to
 * take advantage of this (I wouldn't use 1.0 because of this).

It was updated last night.

Satoshi