Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT) From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: itojun@itojun.org Cc: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portlint check to dependency pathname Message-ID: <199709170827.BAA20808@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <21220.874484251@itojun.csl.sony.co.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* >Can't you just use the whole "${PORTSDIR}/x11/libsx" thing?
*
* Yes I plan to use that.
* I was unsure about the interpretation of ${PORTSDIR} in portlint.
* (Should it be "/usr/ports", or should it be "../..". While testing
* a port people may not be using /usr/ports...)
It should be /usr/ports if the environment variable is not set. (To
be strict, you should check /etc/make.conf too, but that's probably
asking too much.) If people have a complete tree, they should have
${PORTSDIR} set to that -- if not, "../.." won't help anyway.
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709170827.BAA20808>